A Pennsylvania-based research, organizing, and networking center for the grassroots environmental justice movement.

Comparison of Pennsylvania Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Legislation — Fuels / Technologies

Click here to view Comparison of Incentives and Mechanisms

Fuel / TechnologySB 962HB 2250SB 1030Rendell / McGinty DraftGoal
CleanWind PowerYYYYY
Solar PhotovoltaicYYYYY
Solar ThermalYYYYY
GeothermalYYYYn/a
WaterLow-Impact HydropowerNYYYY
(if “low-impact” is defined and
if no NEW dams are allowed)
Ocean-BasedYNNNY
GasDigester GasY
(size limit and no new CAFOs)
YYYY
(size limit and no new CAFOs)
Landfill GasY
(if filtered)
YYYY
(if filtered)
IncinerationForest Wood / “Energy Crops”NYYYN
Agricultural Crop ResidueNN??N
Animal Factory WastesNN??N
Paper & Lumber Mill Wood WastesNNN?N
Construction / Demolition Wood WasteNNN?N
Sewage SludgeNNN?N
TiresNNN?N
Municipal Solid Waste (Trash)NNN?N
FossilWaste CoalNYYYN
Coal-Bed MethaneNNNYN
MiscFuel CellsY
(if hydrogen produced cleanly)
NNYY
(if hydrogen produced cleanly)
Anything else the PUC wants to addNNYNN
Carbon OffsetsNNYYN
Energy EfficiencyYNYYY

Wind Power

Solar Photovoltaic and Solar Thermal

  • Solar ShareA solar share is essentially a requirement that solar play a role in the RPS. The New Jersey law is the best model for Pennsylvania, since it favors small-scale, distributed generation, offering increased reliability and security for the grid. Solar power advocates are recommending a solar share of a quarter of one percent of our energy coming from solar by the end of a 10-year time frame.
  • Dedicated Compliance FeeThe strategic application of compliance fees can also help ensure fuel-mix diversity. Compliance fees are fees paid for non-compliance with the RPS. These fees are used to create a Clean Energy Fund that gives grants out for renewable technology development. Rather than allow these funds to be used for any technology, it’s wise to limit the use of the grants to the technologies needing the most support. The Rendell administration’s draft as well as the new Maryland RPS limit the use of fees to benefit only Tier 1 renewables. SB 962 goes further and limits it to only solar power, since that is the technology in most need of support.
  • Extra Credit / Credit MultipliersTo balance the playing field, some state RPS laws contain extra credit multipliers for certain technologies. Arizona, Maryland and New Mexico’s laws provide extra credits for solar, allowing solar power to qualify for double or triple credits. SB 962 offers a triple credit. Since this credit applies only to the premium (approx. 2 cents on top of each 6 cent/kwh of electricity), the credit multiplier isn’t likely to be enough to make solar competitive in the short term. Long term (several years from now), as the cost of solar nears the cost of other renewables, the credit multiplier can help make solar even more competitive.

Geothermal

Low-Impact Hydropower

Ocean-Based

Digester Gas

Landfill Gas

Forest Wood / “Energy Crops”

  • vegetation produced on Conservation Reserve Program lands, national or state forests or publicly-owned roadless areas;
  • genetically modified organisms;
  • plants or trees used in phytoremediation projects;
  • plants or trees which have been exposed to sewage sludge or other wastes used as fertilizer;
  • plants or trees which have been exposed to pesticides or herbicides that are formulated with halogens or heavy metals; or
  • municipal solid, industrial, residual or any hazardous waste burned for the generation of electric energy.

Agricultural Crop Residue

Other Waste Streams

Waste Coal

Coal-bed Methane

Fuels Cells

Anything else the PUC wants to add

Carbon Offsets

Energy Efficiency


Return to PA Clean Energy Homepage